Triple
T15947217
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aoba-ku |
E386714
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sendai High Court |
E12643
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sendai High Court | Statement: [Aoba-ku, contains, Sendai High Court]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sendai High Court Context triple: [Aoba-ku, contains, Sendai High Court]
-
A.
Sendai High Court
chosen
The Sendai High Court is one of Japan’s regional appellate courts, handling appeals from lower courts in the Tōhoku region.
-
B.
Takamatsu High Court
The Takamatsu High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction.
-
C.
Sapporo High Court
The Sapporo High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts in its jurisdiction in northern Japan.
-
D.
Osaka High Court
Osaka High Court is one of Japan’s major regional appellate courts, handling appeals and important cases from lower courts in the Kansai region.
-
E.
Nagoya High Court
Nagoya High Court is one of Japan’s regional high courts, serving as an appellate court that reviews decisions from lower courts within its jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da882448190a82ea962fe343b79 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e156d2fda8819085279d2a0f8a02ab |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffb5c0c8a481908aa7a40bca15e38e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:53 a.m.