Triple
T15947157
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Allamakee County, Iowa |
E386713
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Harpers Ferry, Iowa
Harpers Ferry, Iowa is a small riverside city in northeastern Iowa known for its location along the Mississippi River and its outdoor recreation opportunities.
|
E1184302
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Harpers Ferry, Iowa | Statement: [Allamakee County, Iowa, contains, Harpers Ferry, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Harpers Ferry, Iowa Context triple: [Allamakee County, Iowa, contains, Harpers Ferry, Iowa]
-
A.
Yorktown, Iowa
Yorktown, Iowa is a small rural city in southwestern Iowa known for its agricultural surroundings and close-knit community.
-
B.
Farragut, Iowa
Farragut, Iowa is a small city in Fremont County named in honor of U.S. Civil War Admiral David Farragut.
-
C.
Havelock, Iowa
Havelock, Iowa is a small rural city in Pocahontas County in northwestern Iowa.
-
D.
Hudson, Iowa
Hudson, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa that functions as a suburban community within the Waterloo–Cedar Falls metropolitan area.
-
E.
Harlan, Iowa
Harlan, Iowa is a small city in western Iowa that serves as the county seat of Shelby County and a local hub for the surrounding rural communities.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Harpers Ferry, Iowa Triple: [Allamakee County, Iowa, contains, Harpers Ferry, Iowa]
Generated description
Harpers Ferry, Iowa is a small riverside city in northeastern Iowa known for its location along the Mississippi River and its outdoor recreation opportunities.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Harpers Ferry, Iowa Target entity description: Harpers Ferry, Iowa is a small riverside city in northeastern Iowa known for its location along the Mississippi River and its outdoor recreation opportunities.
-
A.
Yorktown, Iowa
Yorktown, Iowa is a small rural city in southwestern Iowa known for its agricultural surroundings and close-knit community.
-
B.
Farragut, Iowa
Farragut, Iowa is a small city in Fremont County named in honor of U.S. Civil War Admiral David Farragut.
-
C.
Havelock, Iowa
Havelock, Iowa is a small rural city in Pocahontas County in northwestern Iowa.
-
D.
Hudson, Iowa
Hudson, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa that functions as a suburban community within the Waterloo–Cedar Falls metropolitan area.
-
E.
Harlan, Iowa
Harlan, Iowa is a small city in western Iowa that serves as the county seat of Shelby County and a local hub for the surrounding rural communities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da882448190a82ea962fe343b79 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e156d1a4c08190afc325491ba38870 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffb5c0c8a481908aa7a40bca15e38e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ffb6d3bc6c81909e4bbedeea557615 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ffb7364cf88190b0930af7768dc429 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:53 a.m.