Triple

T15884184
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 4 Wheat. 518 E385147 entity
Predicate caseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Dartmouth College v. Woodward E79731 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dartmouth College v. Woodward | Statement: [4 Wheat. 518, caseName, Dartmouth College v. Woodward]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Context triple: [4 Wheat. 518, caseName, Dartmouth College v. Woodward]
  • A. Dartmouth College v. Woodward chosen
    Dartmouth College v. Woodward is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the protection of corporate charters as contracts under the Constitution, limiting states’ power to alter them.
  • B. Grove City College v. Bell
    Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
  • C. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • D. Pickering v. Board of Education
    Pickering v. Board of Education is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that established First Amendment protections for public employees speaking as private citizens on matters of public concern.
  • E. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da5b800819083a31be937d738b0 completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e156186b98819087b80ade6bd71a69 completed April 16, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffb04598e0819094274868941195b9 completed May 9, 2026, 10:08 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:51 a.m.