Triple
T1587337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Mexico |
E34095
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDeFactoLanguage |
P237
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Spanish |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish | Statement: [New Mexico, hasDeFactoLanguage, Spanish]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDeFactoLanguage Context triple: [New Mexico, hasDeFactoLanguage, Spanish]
-
A.
deFactoLanguage
chosen
Indicates that a language is used in practice as the primary or common language in a context, even if it has no official legal status there.
-
B.
isWorkingLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is officially used as a medium of work, communication, or operation within a specified organization, institution, or context.
-
C.
hasLanguageOfOfficialName
Indicates that an entity’s official name is expressed in a specified language.
-
D.
isLinguaFrancaOf
Indicates that a language serves as a common medium of communication between speakers of different native languages within a particular region, community, or context.
-
E.
isLanguageOf
Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885fceb2c8190b47e0f7c0aefbff0 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a93aedd45c819085843ac843d640e8 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 8:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907bdc19081908c84c5c0aa09e282 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.