Triple
T15845049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | North Georgia |
E384192
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Toccoa, Georgia |
E65520
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Toccoa, Georgia | Statement: [North Georgia, contains, Toccoa, Georgia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Toccoa, Georgia Context triple: [North Georgia, contains, Toccoa, Georgia]
-
A.
Toccoa, Georgia
chosen
Toccoa, Georgia is a small city in northeastern Georgia known for its historic downtown, nearby Toccoa Falls, and role as a regional hub in the Appalachian foothills.
-
B.
Townsend, Georgia
Townsend, Georgia is a small unincorporated community in coastal southeastern Georgia known for its rural character and proximity to marshlands and waterways.
-
C.
De Soto, Georgia
De Soto, Georgia is a small rural city located in southwestern Georgia in the United States.
-
D.
Tallapoosa, Georgia
Tallapoosa, Georgia is a small city in Haralson County in western Georgia, known for its historic downtown and location near the Alabama state line.
-
E.
Colquitt, Georgia
Colquitt, Georgia is a small city in southwest Georgia known as the cultural and economic hub of Miller County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da422088190aac39e32e6c68429 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e142eb20088190bb45e37ce3291ef2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00179d63688190bda2758ed4b4e4df |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:50 a.m.