Triple
T15713343
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sunrise Mall (Massapequa) |
E380893
|
entity |
| Predicate | location |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Massapequa |
E493369
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Massapequa | Statement: [Sunrise Mall (Massapequa), location, Massapequa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Massapequa Context triple: [Sunrise Mall (Massapequa), location, Massapequa]
-
A.
Massapequa
Massapequa is a suburban community on Long Island, New York, known as a residential hub with commuter rail access to New York City.
-
B.
Branford Hills
Branford Hills is a residential neighborhood within the town of Branford in New Haven County, Connecticut.
-
C.
West Natick
West Natick is a residential village and commuter suburb within the town of Natick, Massachusetts, known for its access to Boston via the MBTA commuter rail.
-
D.
Massapequa, New York
chosen
Massapequa, New York is a suburban hamlet on Long Island’s South Shore known for its residential neighborhoods, waterfront access, and role as a commuter community for New York City.
-
E.
East Natick
East Natick is a village-level neighborhood within the town of Natick in Middlesex County, Massachusetts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d9bf930819082b30cf6d169297c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04f90aea0819082a9e9fe0f7780b0 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:55 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff757f571881908015fe68df2a5e69 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:45 a.m.