Triple
T156862
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Homer's Odyssey |
E3198
|
entity |
| Predicate | narrativeTechnique |
P834
|
FINISHED |
| Object | in medias res |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: in medias res | Statement: [Homer's Odyssey, narrativeTechnique, in medias res]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: narrativeTechnique Context triple: [Homer's Odyssey, narrativeTechnique, in medias res]
-
A.
narrativePerspective
Indicates the point of view or vantage from which a narrative is told, specifying the relationship between the storyteller and the events being described.
-
B.
storyBy
Indicates that one entity is the creator or author of the story associated with another entity.
-
C.
filmingTechnique
Indicates the specific method or style used to capture visual content during the filming process.
-
D.
fictionalizationOf
Indicates that one entity is a fictional or dramatized representation, adaptation, or reimagining of another (typically real or earlier) entity or event.
-
E.
rhetoricalDevice
chosen
Indicates that one entity is used as a rhetorical device in relation to another, such as a figure of speech, stylistic technique, or persuasive strategy within a discourse.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2527757ec819090b8becb2cf1a862 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258808ff08190a06b6206f635612b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2565ded588190a27319aaa0130b4f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.