Triple
T15618693
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tallapoosa County, Alabama |
E375486
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New Site, Alabama |
E626064
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Site, Alabama | Statement: [Tallapoosa County, Alabama, hasTown, New Site, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New Site, Alabama Context triple: [Tallapoosa County, Alabama, hasTown, New Site, Alabama]
-
A.
New Site, Alabama
chosen
New Site, Alabama is a small rural town in Tallapoosa County known for its quiet community and location in east-central Alabama.
-
B.
New Market, Alabama
New Market, Alabama is a small unincorporated community in Madison County known for its rural character and location in the Huntsville metropolitan area.
-
C.
Webb, Alabama
Webb, Alabama is a small town located in southeastern Alabama within the Dothan metropolitan area.
-
D.
Brent, Alabama
Brent, Alabama is a small city in central Alabama known for its rural character and location within Bibb County.
-
E.
Ensley, Alabama
Ensley, Alabama is a historic industrial neighborhood in Birmingham that developed as a major steelmaking and manufacturing center in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccf2794819096cda4cbcb02d478 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04e997ce481909b2f10d25705fbc6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff56def20881909f835dd44ab9ac2b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:13 a.m.