Triple
T15575049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Town of Shelby |
E374346
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | La Crosse County |
E414646
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: La Crosse County | Statement: [Town of Shelby, locatedIn, La Crosse County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: La Crosse County Context triple: [Town of Shelby, locatedIn, La Crosse County]
-
A.
La Crosse County
chosen
La Crosse County is a county in western Wisconsin known for the city of La Crosse, its Mississippi River bluffs, and a mix of urban, agricultural, and natural landscapes.
-
B.
Winnebago County
Winnebago County is a county in northern Illinois whose largest city and county seat is Rockford.
-
C.
Winnebago County
Winnebago County is a county in east-central Wisconsin that includes cities such as Oshkosh and Neenah along the western shore of Lake Winnebago.
-
D.
Wright County
Wright County is a county in central Minnesota known for its mix of growing suburban communities and rural landscapes west of the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area.
-
E.
Iowa County
Iowa County is a county in eastern Iowa known for its rural landscapes, small towns, and historic communities such as the Amana Colonies.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccd575081908909b71a3f3e3a61 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04e2140388190a8df7b835eaa72ce |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00bafb761881908e7a891ef390982a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:10 a.m.