Triple
T15538875
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Plauen lace |
E370420
|
entity |
| Predicate | patternTechnique |
P14965
|
FINISHED |
| Object | embroidery on net ground |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: embroidery on net ground | Statement: [Plauen lace, patternTechnique, embroidery on net ground]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: patternTechnique Context triple: [Plauen lace, patternTechnique, embroidery on net ground]
-
A.
pattern
Indicates that one entity exhibits, follows, or is characterized by a particular recurring form, structure, or arrangement associated with another entity.
-
B.
patroonOf
Indicates a relationship in which one entity acts as a patron, sponsor, or protector providing support or resources to another entity.
-
C.
airingPattern
Indicates the recurring schedule or pattern according to which something (such as a program or content) is broadcast or made available.
-
D.
kitPattern
Indicates the design or visual pattern featured on a team's kit or uniform.
-
E.
artisticTechnique
chosen
Indicates the method, style, or process used to create or execute an artistic work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cc521a08190921fb50319dddc34 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04430b5188190a555a3cd4fb0c61c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deda7a95c48190bbe29fadcf17191a |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:07 a.m.