Triple
T1547869
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Greater Poland |
E33019
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalCapital |
P2536
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gniezno |
E226276
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gniezno | Statement: [Greater Poland, historicalCapital, Gniezno]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gniezno Context triple: [Greater Poland, historicalCapital, Gniezno]
-
A.
Gniezno
chosen
Gniezno is a historic city in west-central Poland, renowned as the country’s first capital and an early center of Polish statehood and Christianity.
-
B.
Toruń
Toruń is a historic city in northern Poland, renowned for its well-preserved medieval Old Town and as the birthplace of astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus.
-
C.
Sandomierz
Sandomierz is a historic town in southeastern Poland, known for its well-preserved Old Town, medieval architecture, and picturesque location on the Vistula River.
-
D.
Zamość
Zamość is a Renaissance-planned city in southeastern Poland, renowned for its well-preserved Old Town and UNESCO World Heritage status.
-
E.
Poznań
Poznań is a historic and economically significant city in western Poland, known for its medieval Old Town, role as an early center of Polish statehood, and status as a major academic and industrial hub.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ee6db8819099502bc5ce8af881 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb20dd5a88190b3d6e6f0004fe9b4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:05 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae1fb455888190a1408a25b93a70ce |
completed | March 9, 2026, 1:17 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.