Triple
T15467744
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Highbridge and Burnham |
E372072
|
entity |
| Predicate | nearbyPlace |
P2064
|
FINISHED |
| Object | River Brue |
E357421
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: River Brue | Statement: [Highbridge and Burnham, nearbyPlace, River Brue]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: River Brue Context triple: [Highbridge and Burnham, nearbyPlace, River Brue]
-
A.
River Brue
chosen
The River Brue is a river in Somerset, England, that flows through the county’s low-lying Levels and Moors before reaching the Bristol Channel.
-
B.
River Brun
River Brun is a small river in Lancashire, England, that flows through the town of Burnley and contributes to its local landscape and waterways.
-
C.
Glan River
The Glan River is a watercourse in the Austrian state of Carinthia that flows through the city of Klagenfurt before joining the Gurk River.
-
D.
River Kinder
The River Kinder is a small moorland river in the Peak District of England, known for its dramatic Kinder Downfall waterfall and rugged upland scenery.
-
E.
River Ogmore
River Ogmore is a river in South Wales that flows through the town of Bridgend before reaching the Bristol Channel.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cc8bd308190886949510b42e764 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03f69a31c81909a749247b6615d91 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:46 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff8759922c8190ae5a5700e3ecc87c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:33 a.m.