Triple

T1539312
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jack Phillips E32827 entity
Predicate legalCaseInvolved P17092 FINISHED
Object Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission E5194 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission | Statement: [Jack Phillips, legalCaseInvolved, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Context triple: [Jack Phillips, legalCaseInvolved, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
  • A. Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission chosen
    Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, on narrow grounds, that Colorado officials had shown unconstitutional hostility toward a baker’s religious beliefs when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against his refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
  • B. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd.
    Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. is a Colorado bakery best known for its central role in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case involving religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws.
  • C. Colorado Department of State v. Baca
    Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
  • D. City of Boerne v. Flores
    City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
  • E. DeBoer v. Snyder
    DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseInvolved
Context triple: [Jack Phillips, legalCaseInvolved, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission]
  • A. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • B. associatedCourtCase chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
  • C. legalRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
  • D. statuteInvolved
    Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
  • E. legalOutcome
    Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aa95c1a2948190a2b98469afec1a7d completed March 6, 2026, 8:52 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad608813548190b156fb9470ed3239 completed March 8, 2026, 11:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907b2453c8190a41f6b88c8217d1e completed March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.