Triple
T1539012
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Schenck v. United States |
E32820
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterCharacterization |
P662
|
FINISHED |
| Object | often criticized as overly restrictive of free speech |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often criticized as overly restrictive of free speech | Statement: [Schenck v. United States, laterCharacterization, often criticized as overly restrictive of free speech]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterCharacterization Context triple: [Schenck v. United States, laterCharacterization, often criticized as overly restrictive of free speech]
-
A.
characterizedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses a defining quality, feature, or attribute expressed by another entity.
-
B.
laterDevelopments
Indicates that subsequent events, changes, or outcomes occurred following an earlier situation or state.
-
C.
laterStatus
Indicates that one entity represents a subsequent or resulting status or condition of another entity in time.
-
D.
laterNamed
Indicates that an entity was given a new name at a later time, linking its original identity to its subsequent name.
-
E.
laterPerception
Indicates that one entity’s perception, awareness, or observation of something occurs after another specified time, event, or perception.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a915f323bc8190aa757142c225e0ae |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b046448190be8ea4d7b20255f7 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.