Triple
T1536778
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana |
E32567
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAreaRankInUS |
P1891
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 38 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 38 | Statement: [Indiana, hasAreaRankInUS, 38]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAreaRankInUS Context triple: [Indiana, hasAreaRankInUS, 38]
-
A.
areaRankInUS
chosen
Indicates the relative position of an entity in a ranking of areas within the United States, based on its size.
-
B.
areaRankingInContiguousUS
Indicates the relative position of an entity when U.S. states are ordered by area, considering only those in the contiguous United States.
-
C.
isInMetropolitanAreaRank
Indicates that one metropolitan area holds a specific rank or position relative to others based on a defined metropolitan-area-related criterion (such as size, population, or importance).
-
D.
areaRank
Indicates the relative ordering or position of an entity based on the size of its area compared to others.
-
E.
rankByPopulationInUS
Indicates the relative ordering of entities based on the size of their populations within the United States.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ea86308190998f6bc14bb91f8e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a915f323bc8190aa757142c225e0ae |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b046448190be8ea4d7b20255f7 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.