Triple
T1536307
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Courts of Appeal |
E32556
|
entity |
| Predicate | publishedOpinionsAre |
P29605
|
FINISHED |
| Object | precedential in California |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: precedential in California | Statement: [California Courts of Appeal, publishedOpinionsAre, precedential in California]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: publishedOpinionsAre Context triple: [California Courts of Appeal, publishedOpinionsAre, precedential in California]
-
A.
opinionBy
Indicates that a particular opinion, viewpoint, or judgment is expressed or held by a specific entity.
-
B.
publishedAs
Indicates that an entity is released, issued, or made publicly available under a particular name, format, or identity.
-
C.
publishedFor
Indicates that something (such as a work, document, or content) is published with a particular audience, recipient, or target group in mind.
-
D.
notableOpinion
Indicates that one entity holds a significant or widely recognized opinion or viewpoint about another entity.
-
E.
hasDifferentOpinionsOn
Indicates that two or more entities hold differing views or judgments regarding a particular topic, issue, or subject.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ea86308190998f6bc14bb91f8e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a915f323bc8190aa757142c225e0ae |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b046448190be8ea4d7b20255f7 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a915f1694081908f87b509eda1309f |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.