Triple
T15320629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rhine River Basin |
E366280
|
entity |
| Predicate | tributary |
P415
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sieg River |
E1056795
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sieg River | Statement: [Rhine River Basin, tributary, Sieg River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sieg River Context triple: [Rhine River Basin, tributary, Sieg River]
-
A.
Sieg River
chosen
The Sieg River is a tributary of the Rhine in western Germany, flowing through North Rhine-Westphalia and Rhineland-Palatinate.
-
B.
Inn River
The Inn River is a major Alpine river in Central Europe that flows through Switzerland, Austria, and Germany before joining the Danube.
-
C.
Idenburg River
The Idenburg River is a significant tributary in the river system of New Guinea, contributing to the flow and drainage basin of the Mamberamo River.
-
D.
Blau River
The Blau River is a small river in the state of Baden-Württemberg in southern Germany, known for flowing through the Swabian Jura and joining the Danube at Ulm.
-
E.
Ahr River
The Ahr River is a tributary of the Rhine in western Germany, known for flowing through the Eifel region and its surrounding wine-growing valleys.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a121520819093dcce999fdefe1a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03dd460288190b5c41f0a0aeee949 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0067948b308190a434cdf1d45ebef4 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 11:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:16 a.m.