Triple

T15284237
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gonzaga E365353 entity
Predicate nobleTitle P914 FINISHED
Object Lords of Mantua E1106007 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lords of Mantua | Statement: [Gonzaga, nobleTitle, Lords of Mantua]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lords of Mantua
Context triple: [Gonzaga, nobleTitle, Lords of Mantua]
  • A. Lords of Mantua chosen
    Lords of Mantua was the noble title held by the Gonzaga family as the ruling lords of the Italian city of Mantua during the late Middle Ages and Renaissance.
  • B. Lords of Padua
    The Lords of Padua were the medieval ruling dynasties—most notably the Carraresi family—that governed the Italian city of Padua and its surrounding territories until their fall to Venetian expansion.
  • C. Lord of Pesaro
    Lord of Pesaro was a noble title associated with the della Rovere family’s rule over the Italian city of Pesaro during the Renaissance.
  • D. Lord of Montalto
    Lord of Montalto is a noble title historically associated with the influential Italian Farnese dynasty.
  • E. Lord of Forlì
    Lord of Forlì was the Renaissance seigneurial title governing the city of Forlì and its surrounding territory in Romagna, Italy.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a103d9081908c1ea6c4c73ac8e3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e00e53c9588190a6cb61ac8805c706 completed April 15, 2026, 10:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69feef798a588190981c77e6f4c6be78 completed May 9, 2026, 8:25 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:15 a.m.