Triple
T15248756
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Township Council–Manager |
E364458
|
entity |
| Predicate | managerResponsibleFor |
P636
|
FINISHED |
| Object | day-to-day administration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: day-to-day administration | Statement: [Township Council–Manager, managerResponsibleFor, day-to-day administration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managerResponsibleFor Context triple: [Township Council–Manager, managerResponsibleFor, day-to-day administration]
-
A.
responsibleFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
B.
cabinetResponsibleTo
Indicates that a cabinet is politically accountable to, and can be held responsible by, a particular authority or body.
-
C.
accountableThrough
Indicates that one entity bears responsibility or can be held answerable by means of, or via the mechanism provided by, another entity or process.
-
D.
accountabilityTo
Indicates that one entity is responsible for explaining, justifying, or answering for its actions, decisions, or outcomes to another entity.
-
E.
assignedTo
Indicates that responsibility for a task, item, or role has been designated to a specific entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0dde7481908fc64d1e82d5d20d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e007f62b9c8190b9ad40e2d1912b63 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deca8d1bd48190a4b94f29b425e335 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:13 a.m.