Triple
T15240404
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kingdom of Hyderabad |
E364239
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Princely state |
C3295
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Princely state Context triple: [Kingdom of Hyderabad, instanceOf, Princely state]
-
A.
Rajput princely state
A Rajput princely state was a semi-autonomous, monarch-ruled territory in the Indian subcontinent governed by a Rajput dynasty under the suzerainty of larger empires such as the Mughals or the British Crown.
-
B.
group of princely states
A group of princely states is a collection of semi-autonomous, monarch-ruled territories historically bound together under a larger imperial or colonial framework for purposes of governance, diplomacy, or administration.
-
C.
vassal state
chosen
A vassal state is a subordinate political entity that retains limited internal autonomy while owing allegiance, tribute, or military support to a more powerful sovereign state.
-
D.
hereditary principality
A hereditary principality is a sovereign or semi-sovereign territory ruled by a prince whose authority and title are passed down through a family line, typically by primogeniture or other dynastic succession rules.
-
E.
Nizam of Hyderabad
The Nizam of Hyderabad was the hereditary monarch and ruler of the princely state of Hyderabad in south-central India, known for immense wealth, semi-autonomous governance under British suzerainty, and a significant role in regional politics until the state's integration into the Indian Union in 1948.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0dde7481908fc64d1e82d5d20d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:13 a.m.