Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. | Statement: [Giles S. Rich, notableCase, State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.]

Target entity: State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.
Context triple: [Giles S. Rich, notableCase, State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.]

• A. United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
  United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to impair public contracts under the Constitution’s Contract Clause.
• B. Veazie Bank v. Fenno
  Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
• C. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
  Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
• D. Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank
  Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action for aiding and abetting under the federal securities fraud provisions, significantly limiting secondary liability in securities litigation.
• E. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
  Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.
Triple: [Giles S. Rich, notableCase, State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.]

State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. is a landmark 1998 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision that opened the door to the broad patentability of computer-implemented business methods.

Target entity: State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.
Target entity description: State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. is a landmark 1998 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision that opened the door to the broad patentability of computer-implemented business methods.

• A. United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
  United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to impair public contracts under the Constitution’s Contract Clause.
• B. Veazie Bank v. Fenno
  Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
• C. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
  Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
• D. Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank
  Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action for aiding and abetting under the federal securities fraud provisions, significantly limiting secondary liability in securities litigation.
• E. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
  Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.
• F. None of above. chosen