Triple
T15209865
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Brunswick militia |
E363485
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusAfterConfederation |
P117133
|
FINISHED |
| Object | predecessor of later Canadian militia forces |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: predecessor of later Canadian militia forces | Statement: [New Brunswick militia, statusAfterConfederation, predecessor of later Canadian militia forces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusAfterConfederation Context triple: [New Brunswick militia, statusAfterConfederation, predecessor of later Canadian militia forces]
-
A.
enteredConfederation
Indicates that an entity became a member of, or formally joined, a confederation.
-
B.
successorConfederation
Indicates that one confederation succeeds another as its historical or organizational continuation.
-
C.
formerConfederation
Indicates that an entity was previously part of a confederation but is no longer a member.
-
D.
confederation1
Indicates a relationship where multiple entities join together in a loose alliance or union while retaining their individual autonomy.
-
E.
confederation2
Indicates a formal alliance or union in which multiple entities join together under a shared framework while retaining their individual autonomy.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0b78bc8190b6e5ad51a2c4cfc5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0076ad4ec81908d36f541fca08d72 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb97ee9d881908711dbe12a55283c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dec72059c08190a34f513a00185b08 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:11 a.m.