Triple
T15157014
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prince v. Massachusetts |
E362104
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts |
E362104
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts | Statement: [Prince v. Massachusetts, fullCaseName, Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Context triple: [Prince v. Massachusetts, fullCaseName, Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts]
-
A.
Prince v. Massachusetts
chosen
Prince v. Massachusetts is a 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state authority to regulate child labor and limit children's religiously motivated activities in public for their protection.
-
B.
Memoirs v. Massachusetts
Memoirs v. Massachusetts is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the legal test for obscenity under the First Amendment, further protecting controversial literary works from censorship.
-
C.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial evidence and that defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to confront the analysts who prepared them.
-
D.
Alden v. Maine
Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
-
E.
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded First Amendment protections by recognizing corporations’ rights to spend money to influence ballot initiatives.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0060c62b08190bcdbd912d011d1ba |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69febff87b6c819097f5cc99b2d75fb6 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:08 a.m.