Triple
T15139166
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | S.W.3d |
E361636
|
entity |
| Predicate | predecessorSeries |
P13316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | S.W.2d |
E358170
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: S.W.2d | Statement: [S.W.3d, predecessorSeries, S.W.2d]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: S.W.2d Context triple: [S.W.3d, predecessorSeries, S.W.2d]
-
A.
S.W.2d
chosen
S.W.2d is the standard legal citation abbreviation for the second series of the South Western Reporter, a regional case law reporter covering appellate decisions from several U.S. states.
-
B.
S.W.3d
S.W.3d is the standard legal citation abbreviation for the third series of the South Western Reporter, a regional case law reporter covering appellate decisions from several U.S. states.
-
C.
Sossamon v. Texas
Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
-
D.
Alabama v. Texas
Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
-
E.
Zurawski v. State of Texas
Zurawski v. State of Texas is a high-profile lawsuit in which women denied medically necessary abortions challenge the state’s near-total abortion ban as unconstitutional and dangerously restrictive to pregnant patients’ health.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a06450081909c5a14ea9851a15e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e005b59b488190b0016970647e7483 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69febfec3ae48190b2d8e853dab00777 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:07 a.m.