Triple

T15136996
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject naive set theory E361579 entity
Predicate isInconsistentBecauseOf P58881 FINISHED
Object Cantor's paradox E14593 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cantor's paradox | Statement: [naive set theory, isInconsistentBecauseOf, Cantor's paradox]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cantor's paradox
Context triple: [naive set theory, isInconsistentBecauseOf, Cantor's paradox]
  • A. Cantor’s paradox chosen
    Cantor’s paradox is a foundational result in set theory showing that the “set of all sets” cannot exist because its power set would have a strictly larger cardinality, leading to a contradiction.
  • B. Burali-Forti paradox
    The Burali-Forti paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in set theory that arises from considering the set of all ordinal numbers, showing that such a totality cannot consistently exist as a set.
  • C. Russell’s paradox
    Russell’s paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in naive set theory that reveals problems with sets that contain themselves, leading to major developments in modern logic and the axiomatization of set theory.
  • D. Cantor’s theorem
    Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
  • E. Barber paradox
    The Barber paradox is a self-referential logical puzzle about a barber who shaves all and only those who do not shave themselves, illustrating a contradiction similar to Russell’s paradox.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a06450081909c5a14ea9851a15e completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e005b3f6f48190b1ed7c7b28feb7a6 completed April 15, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fec88096f081908897fd1c5362c274 completed May 9, 2026, 5:39 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:07 a.m.