Triple
T151318
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Province of Canterbury |
E3436
|
entity |
| Predicate | followsPolity |
P1815
|
FINISHED |
| Object | episcopal polity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: episcopal polity | Statement: [Province of Canterbury, followsPolity, episcopal polity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsPolity Context triple: [Province of Canterbury, followsPolity, episcopal polity]
-
A.
hasPolity
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a particular political organization, governance structure, or state-like authority.
-
B.
politicalFunction
Indicates that an entity holds, performs, or is associated with a specific role, duty, or function within a political system or structure.
-
C.
politicalPattern
Indicates a recurring or characteristic way in which political behaviors, decisions, or power dynamics are organized or expressed.
-
D.
relatedLegislation
Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
-
E.
politicalRationale
Indicates the reasoning, justification, or strategic considerations underlying a political decision, stance, or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a252868de4819080e21c9938bfe8b6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2580f55a88190b37b54ee0ed5ac7c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2565adaf48190b68ae4444ff83ccd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.