Triple
T15077622
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hartley County |
E380046
|
entity |
| Predicate | countySeat |
P383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Channing, Texas |
E1164505
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Channing, Texas | Statement: [Hartley County, countySeat, Channing, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Channing, Texas Context triple: [Hartley County, countySeat, Channing, Texas]
-
A.
Channing, Texas
chosen
Channing, Texas is a small rural city in the Texas Panhandle known historically as a railroad town and ranching community.
-
B.
Chandler, Texas
Chandler, Texas is a small city in East Texas known for its rural community character and proximity to the larger city of Tyler.
-
C.
Chireno, Texas
Chireno, Texas is a small rural community in East Texas known for its historic roots and close-knit, predominantly agricultural character.
-
D.
Chico, Texas
Chico, Texas is a small rural town in north-central Texas known for its tight-knit community and location within Wise County.
-
E.
Channelview, Texas
Channelview, Texas is an unincorporated community and census-designated place in eastern Harris County that serves as an industrial and residential suburb of Houston.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd7683881908d405c1b5d7b4f7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dff7fe5a208190823900b25e298dab |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff56b25a808190b56f8ab3c506b771 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:03 a.m.