Triple
T15070368
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Versailles arms limitations |
E379858
|
entity |
| Predicate | effectivelyViolatedBy |
P29586
|
FINISHED |
| Object | German reintroduction of conscription in 1935 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German reintroduction of conscription in 1935 | Statement: [Versailles arms limitations, effectivelyViolatedBy, German reintroduction of conscription in 1935]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: effectivelyViolatedBy Context triple: [Versailles arms limitations, effectivelyViolatedBy, German reintroduction of conscription in 1935]
-
A.
violationOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity breaches, disobeys, or infringes upon a rule, law, agreement, or right associated with another entity.
-
B.
violatedPrinciple
Indicates that an entity has broken, disregarded, or acted contrary to a specified rule, norm, or guiding principle.
-
C.
violationContext
Indicates the specific circumstances, conditions, or situational factors under which a violation occurs or is considered to have occurred.
-
D.
allegedViolationSystem
Indicates a system is reported or suspected to have violated a rule, policy, or regulation, without the violation being legally or formally established.
-
E.
assertedViolationOf
Indicates that one party has formally claimed or alleged that a rule, law, standard, or obligation has been violated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd7683881908d405c1b5d7b4f7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dff7f86df48190b3a2cf441fefb477 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deb95a182081908fffc4402b02a394 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:02 a.m.