Triple
T15026873
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Atari 7800 |
E378239
|
entity |
| Predicate | soundProcessor |
P31522
|
FINISHED |
| Object | TIA chip for Atari 2600 compatibility |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: TIA chip for Atari 2600 compatibility | Statement: [Atari 7800, soundProcessor, TIA chip for Atari 2600 compatibility]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: soundProcessor Context triple: [Atari 7800, soundProcessor, TIA chip for Atari 2600 compatibility]
-
A.
audioProcessing
Indicates that one entity performs operations to analyze, modify, or transform audio data associated with another entity.
-
B.
soundHardware
Indicates that an entity is associated with, uses, or provides sound-related hardware components or capabilities.
-
C.
audioChip
Indicates that one entity functions as, or contains, an audio processing chip in relation to another entity.
-
D.
soundChip
chosen
Indicates that one entity functions as or contains the sound-processing chip used by another entity.
-
E.
soundReproductionMethod
Indicates the method or technique used to reproduce or play back sound.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd46b2c819090d054c27787f677 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded7dfcb508190aec8cd667e27a8ea |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de9a67cbc481909c19c2de57de4eb7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:58 a.m.