Triple
T1500445
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Temporal Key Integrity Protocol |
E29783
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | wireless security protocol |
C995
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: wireless security protocol Context triple: [Temporal Key Integrity Protocol, instanceOf, wireless security protocol]
-
A.
network security protocol
chosen
A network security protocol is a defined set of rules and procedures that protect data integrity, confidentiality, and authenticity during communication between devices over a network.
-
B.
Wi‑Fi security certification program
A Wi‑Fi security certification program is a formal framework that evaluates, validates, and labels wireless networks and devices against defined security standards to ensure safe and trustworthy Wi‑Fi usage.
-
C.
Wi-Fi security auditing tool
A Wi-Fi security auditing tool is a software or hardware solution that scans, analyzes, and tests wireless networks to identify vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and potential security threats.
-
D.
cryptographic protocol
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
E.
wireless communication device
A wireless communication device is an electronic apparatus that transmits and receives data over radio or other non-wired signals to enable voice, text, or multimedia communication without physical connections.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498dba1d8819093b46a3a8d2485f1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.