Triple
T14955489
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pacifica Foundation |
E372913
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasContentPolicy |
P57657
|
FINISHED |
| Object | independent from corporate underwriting |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: independent from corporate underwriting | Statement: [Pacifica Foundation, hasContentPolicy, independent from corporate underwriting]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContentPolicy Context triple: [Pacifica Foundation, hasContentPolicy, independent from corporate underwriting]
-
A.
containsPolicyOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes, references, or incorporates a specific policy within it.
-
B.
hasPolicySupport
Indicates that one entity provides endorsement, backing, or approval for a specific policy associated with another entity.
-
C.
hasNotablePolicy
Indicates that an entity possesses a policy that is distinguished, significant, or otherwise noteworthy in its context.
-
D.
hasReferencePolicy
Indicates that an entity is governed by or associated with a specific reference policy that defines how it should be used, accessed, or managed.
-
E.
hasPolicyPage
Indicates that an entity maintains or is associated with a dedicated policy page, typically outlining rules, terms, or guidelines.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cca979481908747d2a81eba1cea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded6cc73848190ac181782b20dc838 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de9a588c2c8190b1245a1c406f447c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:40 a.m.