Triple
T14933743
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Potters Bar |
E372335
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRailServiceTo |
P726
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Seaford |
E115152
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Seaford | Statement: [Potters Bar, hasRailServiceTo, Seaford]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Seaford Context triple: [Potters Bar, hasRailServiceTo, Seaford]
-
A.
Seaford
Seaford is a coastal suburb in the southern metropolitan area of Adelaide, South Australia, known for its beaches and residential community.
-
B.
Seaford
chosen
Seaford is a coastal town in East Sussex, England, historically notable as a parliamentary borough once represented by prominent figures such as William Pitt the Elder.
-
C.
Shoreham
Shoreham is a historic village in Kent, England, known for its picturesque rural setting in the Darent Valley and traditional English countryside charm.
-
D.
New Shoreham
New Shoreham was a former parliamentary borough in Sussex, England, historically represented in the British House of Commons.
-
E.
Rehoboth
Rehoboth is a historic rural town in Bristol County, Massachusetts, known as one of the earliest settlements in the region and noted for its colonial heritage and open spaces.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cc9da0c81908d583ca3f63a3908 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded646a0808190ba5c0c91bde011c5 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:05 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fea5a6135481908b0d49b0f4060c98 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:37 a.m.