Triple

T1491199
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free E29582 entity
Predicate positionOnLicensing P28591 FINISHED
Object favors flexible licensing models LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: favors flexible licensing models | Statement: [Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free, positionOnLicensing, favors flexible licensing models]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOnLicensing
Context triple: [Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free, positionOnLicensing, favors flexible licensing models]
  • A. positionEstablishedIn
    Indicates the point in time or event when a particular position, role, or office was formally created or instituted.
  • B. positionOn
    Indicates that one entity is located on top of or at a specific place along the surface or extent of another entity.
  • C. positionEligible
    Indicates that an entity is qualified or permitted to hold or be assigned to a particular position or role.
  • D. positionInState
    Indicates that one entity occupies or holds a specific position, role, or status within a particular state or condition of another entity.
  • E. positionOnLaw
    Indicates a stance, opinion, or interpretation that an entity holds regarding a specific law or legal provision.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498da82e08190ba833330d05f380f completed March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c6c3ace4819081bc2b86ee2486b6 completed March 1, 2026, 11:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c48902808190a8028d359bcf123e completed March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c52c703c8190a56389b09d97659f completed March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.