Triple
T1487520
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Celebic–South Halmahera languages |
E29500
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposalStatus |
P127
|
FINISHED |
| Object | controversial |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: controversial | Statement: [Celebic–South Halmahera languages, proposalStatus, controversial]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposalStatus Context triple: [Celebic–South Halmahera languages, proposalStatus, controversial]
-
A.
draftStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of an item within a drafting or revision process (e.g., whether it is in draft, under review, or finalized).
-
B.
proposalProcess
Indicates the process or sequence of actions involved in creating, submitting, reviewing, and deciding on a proposal between entities.
-
C.
status
chosen
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
-
D.
amendmentStatus
Indicates the current state or phase of an amendment within its lifecycle (e.g., proposed, pending, approved, rejected, or superseded).
-
E.
oppositionStatus
Indicates that one entity’s stance, condition, or role is characterized by being against, resisting, or in conflict with another entity, proposal, or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498da82e08190ba833330d05f380f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c6a44efc819084254614d8ea4669 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c486eacc81909c272f9bdf50a7c3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.