Triple
T1484527
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maryland–West Virginia boundary (traditional) |
E29434
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDisputes |
P23974
|
FINISHED |
| Object | boundary interpretation between Maryland and Virginia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: boundary interpretation between Maryland and Virginia | Statement: [Maryland–West Virginia boundary (traditional), hasDisputes, boundary interpretation between Maryland and Virginia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisputes Context triple: [Maryland–West Virginia boundary (traditional), hasDisputes, boundary interpretation between Maryland and Virginia]
-
A.
hasDisputeHistory
Indicates that there has been at least one prior dispute or conflict involving the related entities.
-
B.
hasDisputedStatus
chosen
Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
-
C.
handlesDisputesOver
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing, resolving, or adjudicating disputes concerning another entity.
-
D.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
E.
hasDisputedIdentityWith
Indicates that two entities are associated with conflicting, uncertain, or contested identifications, such that their true or correct identities are in dispute relative to each other.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498da82e08190ba833330d05f380f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c6a011f0819086e9ee517ed6d29f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c486eacc81909c272f9bdf50a7c3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.