Triple

T14843205
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject White Wilderness E349017 entity
Predicate hasMythImpact P116045 FINISHED
Object popularization of lemming suicide misconception LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: popularization of lemming suicide misconception | Statement: [White Wilderness, hasMythImpact, popularization of lemming suicide misconception]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMythImpact
Context triple: [White Wilderness, hasMythImpact, popularization of lemming suicide misconception]
  • A. hasMythType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a particular type or category of myth.
  • B. hasMythSource
    Indicates that something derives from, is based on, or is supported by a particular myth or mythological source.
  • C. hasMythicSetting
    Indicates that something is set within a mythic, legendary, or folklore-based world or context.
  • D. hasMythicEvent
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, involves, or features a significant mythic or legendary event.
  • E. hasMythicFunction
    Indicates that something serves a symbolic, narrative, or ritual role within a mythic or mythological framework.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822ec69008190a9232caa68836872 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded28fa49c81908d1059e6cafd607f completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de8c13418c819088ff9905ace1416a completed April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de90806f3881908fcbfec5bd4ab4d2 completed April 14, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:53 a.m.