Triple
T148309
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spencer-Churchill family |
E3375
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageTraditionallySpoken |
P741
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Spencer-Churchill family, languageTraditionallySpoken, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageTraditionallySpoken Context triple: [Spencer-Churchill family, languageTraditionallySpoken, English]
-
A.
languagesSpoken
chosen
Indicates that an entity is able to communicate using one or more specified languages.
-
B.
isWidelySpokenIn
Indicates that a language is spoken by a large portion of the population across many regions or communities within a specified area.
-
C.
nativeLanguage
Indicates the language that a person or entity originally learned and uses as their primary or first language.
-
D.
historicallySpokenIn
Indicates that a language was used for spoken communication in a particular place or region during a past historical period.
-
E.
languageFamily
Indicates that two or more languages belong to the same genealogical language family or linguistic lineage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a252868de4819080e21c9938bfe8b6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a257ecb6f48190992c4c8ca908a81c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a256599db08190a7b000b381d32ec4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.