Triple
T14830049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kinga of Hungary |
E348674
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stary Sącz |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stary Sącz | Statement: [Kinga of Hungary, associatedWith, Stary Sącz]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Stary Sącz Context triple: [Kinga of Hungary, associatedWith, Stary Sącz]
-
A.
Stary Sącz
chosen
Stary Sącz is a historic town in southern Poland known for its well-preserved medieval urban layout and cultural heritage.
-
B.
Nowy Sącz
Nowy Sącz is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, cultural heritage, and role as a local economic and administrative center.
-
C.
Sianów
Sianów is a small town in northwestern Poland known for its historical ties to the Pomerania region and its location near the Baltic coast.
-
D.
Szczekociny
Szczekociny is a small historic town in southern Poland, known for its location in the Silesian Voivodeship and the nearby site of the 1794 Battle of Szczekociny.
-
E.
Ojców
Ojców is a small village in southern Poland known as a gateway to the picturesque Ojców National Park in the Kraków-Częstochowa Upland.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ec69008190a9232caa68836872 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ded0748eec8190a39c94024c3a3e3e |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:51 a.m.