Triple
T14816987
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Randaberg |
E348342
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSettlement |
P1068
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Randaberg village |
E348342
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Randaberg village | Statement: [Randaberg, hasSettlement, Randaberg village]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Randaberg village Context triple: [Randaberg, hasSettlement, Randaberg village]
-
A.
Randaberg
chosen
Randaberg is a coastal municipality in Rogaland county, Norway, situated just north of the city of Stavanger and known for its agriculture and scenic shoreline.
-
B.
Rollag village
Rollag village is a small rural settlement in Norway that serves as the local hub for municipal services and community life in the Rollag area.
-
C.
Ringebu village
Ringebu village is a small settlement in Innlandet county, Norway, known for its scenic valley setting, historic stave church, and location along the Gudbrandsdalslågen river.
-
D.
Bergvik
Bergvik is a small locality in central Sweden situated within Söderhamn Municipality in Gävleborg County.
-
E.
Ballangen village
Ballangen village is a small settlement in Nordland county, Norway, known for its fjord-side location and history of mining activity.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822eb8f588190bf53445e730a934f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69decfe2c1ec81908b3dff7a5d0e85d0 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fe64f8b4148190bc24f9a307178419 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:50 a.m.