Triple
T1481137
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Camperdown |
E30957
|
entity |
| Predicate | BritishCommanderRank |
P2084
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Admiral |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Admiral | Statement: [Battle of Camperdown, BritishCommanderRank, Admiral]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: BritishCommanderRank Context triple: [Battle of Camperdown, BritishCommanderRank, Admiral]
-
A.
commandingOfficerBritishSide
Indicates that one entity serves as the commanding officer of another entity on the British side in a military context.
-
B.
militaryRank
Indicates that one entity holds a specific position or level within a hierarchical military ranking system relative to another entity.
-
C.
commanderOfRAF
Indicates that one entity serves as the commander or head of the Royal Air Force in relation to another entity.
-
D.
militaryRankOfPrecedence
Indicates the relative seniority or priority order of a military rank compared to other ranks.
-
E.
commanderTitle
chosen
Indicates the official rank or title held by the person who commands or leads a given entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498fe55a88190ab7f9e40ace88e49 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c67699848190852e376efe22737c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c484e52c81908948ff8c0a42751b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:11 p.m.