Triple

T14810697
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GECF Statute E348169 entity
Predicate isLegalBasisFor P125 FINISHED
Object GECF governance system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: GECF governance system | Statement: [GECF Statute, isLegalBasisFor, GECF governance system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isLegalBasisFor
Context triple: [GECF Statute, isLegalBasisFor, GECF governance system]
  • A. legalBasis chosen
    Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
  • B. hasLegalBasisSince
    Indicates that something has had a valid legal foundation or authority starting from a specified point in time.
  • C. legalBasisForExecution
    Indicates that one entity serves as the legal justification or authority for carrying out the execution of another entity or action.
  • D. predecessorLegalBasis
    Indicates that one legal basis directly precedes and forms the prior legal foundation for another legal basis.
  • E. hasLegalAuthorityFrom
    Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822eb8f588190bf53445e730a934f completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69decf35a5e081909321193ef37099d1 completed April 14, 2026, 11:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de8c0ef8a4819092d84478b1f56db1 completed April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:46 a.m.