Triple
T14805809
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | government of Carthage |
E348030
|
entity |
| Predicate | evaluatedByAristotleAs |
P86363
|
FINISHED |
| Object | well-balanced constitution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: well-balanced constitution | Statement: [government of Carthage, evaluatedByAristotleAs, well-balanced constitution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evaluatedByAristotleAs Context triple: [government of Carthage, evaluatedByAristotleAs, well-balanced constitution]
-
A.
consideredByAristotleAs
chosen
Indicates that something is regarded or classified in a particular way according to Aristotle’s views or writings.
-
B.
derivesMoralityFrom
Indicates that one entity bases or grounds its moral principles, judgments, or ethical framework on another entity.
-
C.
evaluatesAsNoble
Indicates that an entity is judged or classified as having noble status or qualities.
-
D.
judgedAs
Indicates that one entity evaluates or forms an opinion about another entity according to some criteria or standard.
-
E.
hasPhilosophicalReputation
Indicates that an entity is recognized or regarded as having a notable standing, influence, or esteem within the realm of philosophy.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822ea8b7c819097dfadf3d45545e6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69decf32666081908e84f985c47eb963 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de8c0ef8a4819092d84478b1f56db1 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:34 a.m.