Triple
T14778266
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charlie Watson |
E347319
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLostRelative |
P115752
|
FINISHED |
| Object | father |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: father | Statement: [Charlie Watson, hasLostRelative, father]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLostRelative Context triple: [Charlie Watson, hasLostRelative, father]
-
A.
isLostBy
Indicates that something ceases to be possessed, controlled, or retained by a particular entity.
-
B.
hasCloseRelative
Indicates that one entity has another entity as a close family member, such as a parent, child, sibling, or similarly near relative.
-
C.
hasRelativeLocation
Indicates that one entity is positioned in space in relation to another entity’s location.
-
D.
canBeLostBy
Indicates that something is capable of being lost or forfeited by a particular entity.
-
E.
hasNoLongerExistsAs
Indicates that an entity previously existed in a certain form, state, or identity but no longer exists in that form.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e9b9e08190bedcc31a163fda82 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dec817c39081909b08a0ffdfce9936 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de8c02e5c08190943c27594026faf7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de8f4b67cc8190b84b59fcec5cf579 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:31 a.m.