Triple
T14769
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Packard |
E295
|
entity |
| Predicate | name |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | David Packard |
E295
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: David Packard | Statement: [David Packard, name, David Packard]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: David Packard Context triple: [David Packard, name, David Packard]
-
A.
David Packard
chosen
David Packard was an American electrical engineer, co-founder of Hewlett-Packard, and influential philanthropist and public servant.
-
B.
Robert N. Noyce
Robert N. Noyce was an American physicist, co-inventor of the integrated circuit, and co-founder of Intel Corporation, often called the "Mayor of Silicon Valley" for his pivotal role in the semiconductor industry.
-
C.
Gordon E. Moore
Gordon E. Moore was an American engineer, co-founder of Intel Corporation, and originator of Moore’s Law, which predicted the exponential growth of computing power.
-
D.
Vannevar Bush
American electrical engineer and science administrator (1890~1974)
-
E.
Andrew S. Grove
Andrew S. Grove was a Hungarian-American engineer, businessman, and longtime Intel CEO who played a pivotal role in shaping the modern semiconductor industry and personal computing.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2400257208190b3cd87ad2a06c18f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a26237c7208190ac4a1c373ff37b06 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:34 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.