Triple
T14739322
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Martin McKinney |
E346299
|
entity |
| Predicate | producerOf |
P490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Die For You (song) |
E331479
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Die For You (song) | Statement: [Martin McKinney, producerOf, Die For You (song)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Die For You (song) Context triple: [Martin McKinney, producerOf, Die For You (song)]
-
A.
Die For You
chosen
"Die For You" is a popular R&B song by Canadian singer The Weeknd, known for its emotive vocals, atmospheric production, and enduring chart success.
-
B.
For You For Me
"For You For Me" is a track from Jon Anderson’s 1980 progressive rock solo album "Song of Seven."
-
C.
All for You
All for You is a 2001 dance-pop and R&B song by Janet Jackson that became one of her signature hits, known for its upbeat groove and chart-topping success.
-
D.
All for You
All for You is a song written by Wayne Garfield, best known as one of his notable contributions to contemporary music.
-
E.
All for You
All for You is a 2001 pop and R&B studio album by Janet Jackson known for its upbeat dance tracks and themes of liberation and sensuality.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e6f1c88190bc494d491a907114 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dec73264848190be23c5f0260cbe13 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fdfb91fdf88190bdcc9a93289f6b7f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:29 a.m.