Triple
T14734444
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nina Borowski |
E346166
|
entity |
| Predicate | friendRelationshipType |
P10690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | best friend |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: best friend | Statement: [Nina Borowski, friendRelationshipType, best friend]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: friendRelationshipType Context triple: [Nina Borowski, friendRelationshipType, best friend]
-
A.
relationshipType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
B.
basisOfRelationship
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, cause, or justification for the relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
C.
playerRelations
Indicates the nature or status of the relationship between players, such as alliances, rivalries, or other interpersonal dynamics.
-
D.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
E.
relationshipDynamic
Indicates a changing or evolving pattern of interaction between entities, such as shifts in their roles, closeness, or influence over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822e6f1c88190bc494d491a907114 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dec72ea9348190817efcdaa973d7f7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de8bf9331481909582045cd567d91f |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:29 a.m.