Triple

T14728514
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject True Cross E346005 entity
Predicate contestedAspect P14608 FINISHED
Object authenticity of surviving fragments LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: authenticity of surviving fragments | Statement: [True Cross, contestedAspect, authenticity of surviving fragments]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contestedAspect
Context triple: [True Cross, contestedAspect, authenticity of surviving fragments]
  • A. disputedAspect chosen
    Indicates that a particular feature, detail, or component of something is subject to disagreement or contention between parties.
  • B. contestedBy
    Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
  • C. hasControversialAspect
    Indicates that something includes an element, feature, or aspect that is disputed, debated, or likely to cause disagreement or public criticism.
  • D. contestedAt
    Indicates that an event, claim, or outcome is being challenged or disputed at a particular time or place.
  • E. contention
    Indicates a state of active disagreement, dispute, or conflict between entities over an issue, claim, or resource.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822e5911c8190ba589f957dbd9ba7 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dec26179688190ba9f3cd045da0e2a completed April 14, 2026, 10:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de657e174481909da0437556334a04 completed April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:29 a.m.