Triple
T1472435
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1964 California Democratic presidential primary |
E27164
|
entity |
| Predicate | resultDetermined |
P6592
|
FINISHED |
| Object | delegate allocation for 1964 Democratic National Convention |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: delegate allocation for 1964 Democratic National Convention | Statement: [1964 California Democratic presidential primary, resultDetermined, delegate allocation for 1964 Democratic National Convention]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultDetermined Context triple: [1964 California Democratic presidential primary, resultDetermined, delegate allocation for 1964 Democratic National Convention]
-
A.
resultDetermination
chosen
Indicates the process or criteria by which an outcome, decision, or result is established or concluded from given inputs or conditions.
-
B.
determined
Indicates that an entity has firmly decided on a course of action or conclusion, typically after consideration or effort.
-
C.
result
Indicates that one entity is produced, caused, or brought about as an outcome or consequence of another entity or process.
-
D.
decidedWith
Indicates that an entity made a decision jointly or in agreement with another entity.
-
E.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a496d25d6881909dbd84f86d763992 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c5dc90e481908a4935f266bc7850 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c48350d88190a81bd149103f93e3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m.