Triple
T1470752
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pascal's identity |
E27128
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBoundaryCondition |
P25792
|
FINISHED |
| Object | C(n,0) = 1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: C(n,0) = 1 | Statement: [Pascal's identity, hasBoundaryCondition, C(n,0) = 1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBoundaryCondition Context triple: [Pascal's identity, hasBoundaryCondition, C(n,0) = 1]
-
A.
hasBoundaryType
Indicates that one entity has a boundary characterized by a specific type or classification in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
hasBoundaryFeature
Indicates that a boundary (such as an edge, border, or limit) of one entity is characterized, marked, or defined by a specific feature or element.
-
C.
boundaryCondition
chosen
Indicates the specific constraints or values imposed at the limits or edges of a system, domain, or process that govern its behavior there.
-
D.
hasBoundaryEvent
Indicates that an event occurs at or defines the boundary or limit of another entity or process.
-
E.
setsBoundary
Indicates that one entity defines or forms the limiting edge or border of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a496d25d6881909dbd84f86d763992 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c5d9dd4c8190ba840a9255cd1293 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c48350d88190a81bd149103f93e3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m.