Triple

T147055
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ritchey–Chrétien reflector E3352 entity
Predicate typicalMounting P2519 FINISHED
Object equatorial mount LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equatorial mount | Statement: [Ritchey–Chrétien reflector, typicalMounting, equatorial mount]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalMounting
Context triple: [Ritchey–Chrétien reflector, typicalMounting, equatorial mount]
  • A. typicalHeight
    Indicates the usual or characteristic height associated with an entity, such as a person, object, or species.
  • B. typicalCapacity
    Indicates the usual or standard amount, volume, or capability that something is designed or expected to hold, handle, or perform under normal conditions.
  • C. mountType chosen
    Indicates the manner or configuration in which one object is mounted or attached to another.
  • D. typicalUnitSize
    Indicates the standard or most common size or quantity in which something is typically measured, packaged, or used.
  • E. typicalBackground
    Indicates that an entity has a usual or commonly expected background, context, or setting associated with it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a252868de4819080e21c9938bfe8b6 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a258808ff08190a06b6206f635612b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a256580c2c8190beecca60ca8595f3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.